Forget the rosy USPTO numbers. The real story behind patent challenges at the PTAB suggests most patents brought before it are, frankly, a mess. It's time to ask who's really benefiting from this.
Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan just proved you don't need to read the briefs to rule from the bench. Meanwhile, companies ditch DEI, AI gets a reality check, and a law student's turning Jeopardy into her personal courtroom.
Orbital just flipped the script on legal tech. They're launching Farringdon, their own AI-fueled law firm for UK home sales, turning competitor insights into universal upgrades.
You think the lightbulb guy is the inventor? Wrong. Patent law demands more than a eureka moment—it's a brutal conception test. Buckle up for the truth.
Everyone figured state surveillance in the Middle East was bad, but this hack-for-hire phishing blitz on Egyptian journalists flips the script—it's outsourced repression, cheap and deniable. Access Now's bombshell report lays it bare.
Scientific Games thought they dodged another antitrust bullet with a statute of limitations defense. Judge Blakey just slammed the door on that. Discovery rule to the rescue—for now.
You're unemployed, idea burning a hole in your pocket, and some outfit offers patents for peanuts. Sounds like a steal—until it drives off a cliff like a Yugo.
Think universities are rolling in dough from their patented research? Think again. For most, it's a costly money pit, not a goldmine.
The Federal Circuit just told the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) they're doing their homework wrong, again. This time, it's all about 'inherency' in patent law, and Apple's lawyers are probably popping champagne.
Silicon Valley's been buzzing about AI's potential to disrupt everything, but it turns out the real scandal might be old-fashioned human bias creeping into patent reviews. Now, Congress wants answers.
Inventors hit a wall: killer concept, zero prototype. But patent law doesn't demand you build it first. Here's how to lock in protection early—before engineers steal your thunder.
OpenAI's slipping in a $100 Pro plan for ChatGPT power users hooked on Codex. It's a direct jab at Claude—but after 20 years watching these pricing games, I'm not buying the 'more capacity per dollar' spin just yet.
Picture this: You're staring at your fitness tracker's blood pressure log, tempted to paste it into Meta's shiny new AI. But what happens when Muse Spark crunches your vitals and dishes out health tips?
Clients, brace yourselves—Paul Weiss just crossed $4 billion in revenue, the only Manhattan Biglaw firm to do it. But does this boom from AI deals help anyone besides the partners?
AI's churning out marketing content at zero cost — but it's mostly slop. Haast just raised $12M to ensure it doesn't land companies in legal hot water.
Picture this: your AI startup's facing a vague new federal reg. Will courts stick to the letter — or sneak in the lawmakers' real intent? A hidden shift is underway.
BigLaw expected more grunt workers for IP drudgery. Arnold & Porter just flipped the script with a firmwide boss hunt. Smells like trouble brewing.
Anthropic just dropped Claude Managed Agents, claiming it's all you need for scalable AI agents. Here's why legal tech pros shouldn't panic – yet.
Forget slow legal evolution. This week's docket explodes with AI showdowns: Musk suing over regs, lawyers busted for fake cases, judges clapping back at critics. The future's here, and it's messy.
Picture this: a partner fires off a 2 a.m. demand, and you jump. No more. AI's rewriting the legal playbook, handing back precious hours while steeling the profession against rule-of-law threats.