Picture this: AI summits packed with Big Tech suits, whispering sweet nothings about 'AI for good' while grabbing data goldmines. Chinasa Okolo says enough — it's time for the Majority World to rewrite the rules.
Imagine buying your freedom from the jailer. That's digital sovereignty today—states handing cash to Big Tech for the illusion of control. A futurist vision flips the script.
Elon Musk wants regulation for robotics. Don't mistake this for a sudden outbreak of conscience—it's a strategic move that benefits him far more than you'd think.
The Pentagon is using Anthropic's Claude to make military decisions that could cost lives. The question isn't whether AI works—it's whether we should trust it with a trigger.
Next week in Finland, someone's finally going to ask the uncomfortable question: Can we actually regulate robots before they're everywhere? Three workshops at the European Robotics Forum suggest the legal community is running out of time to answer.
When we talk about roboethics, we're not discussing abstract moral philosophy. We're talking about the real architectural decisions that determine whether a robot helps or harms.
Expectations ran high for AI giants to match their safety rhetoric with action. The new AI Safety Index shatters that illusion, exposing deep flaws while frontrunners pull away.
The EU's AI Act promises ironclad governance. Novelli's crew reveals it's more wishlist than blueprint.
Brussels bureaucrats aren't sleeping easy. The EU AI Act dumps 88 responsibilities on Member States, with deadlines kicking in as early as February 2025—exposing cracks in Europe's unified AI vision.